Thanks Jcarot and CheyAut!
Thanks for explaining the bay and chestnut agouti and extension genes! Makes much more sense. Maybe the father carried the A+ gene...
Pictures of some Belgians today (from OK State)
It is true that the commonly seen Belgian is chestnut today. BUT as I said before this is an AMISH Belgian and therefore not affected by the trends of the horseworld. The fact that we are allowed to breed to the stud is an honor. The line was established in the 1800's. That is before the fad hit to have chestnuts with flaxen manes and tails pulling the wagon.
The quote used was a quote from the Belgian Review and was an advertisement trying to sell the Belgian as an easy to match horse for teams.
The truth of the matter is that the only horses available to breed from 1913 to 1937 were those already in the country, 1773 belgians were registered at that time (1910). WWII stopped the importation of new stallions (but by 1937 there 3196 horses registered). So the horses that were available to the public all got mixed together and yes, they are now a one color breed IN AMERICA overseas where there was a larger population to choose from and breed the Belgian is not all chestnut.
Quote:
In America, its color is usually chestnut or roan with white or blonde mane, tail and points.
Information supplied by the Belgian Draft Horse Corporation of America
To get the white or blonde mane/tail, what modifier must be present?