Horse Slaughter
Last post 07-25-2008 7:32 AM by akhal-teke. 96 replies.
-
-
-
-
SpottedPony_horse


- Joined on 08-03-2005
- Western Pennsylvania
- Under Saddle
|
Please explain how over breeding and having an excess supply of horses is the cause of slaughter. Horses go to slaughter for the same reasons that cattle, pigs, sheep, and chickens go to slaughter, there is a demand for their meat and byproducts, nothing more, nothing less. You reduce the supply of horses in this country by banning most breedings, do you really expect that horses will no longer go to slaughter? As long as there is a demand for horse meat, they will continue to go to slaughter. The killer buyers will have to pay higher prices, but they will pay them as long they have customers willing to pay the increased prices. Increased prices will make it harder for individules and rescues to buy horses to save them from slaughter. And if the killers pay enough, then there will be those looking for a fast buck who will be willing to steal someone's horses to sell to the killers. Is that what you are wanting to have happen? It's economics, supply and demand. Get rid of the demand for horse meat and then the slaughter houses will have to close because there will be little or no money in it.
Spotted Pony
|
|
-
-
povertybyhorse


- Joined on 07-14-2007
- Indiana
- Under Saddle
|
CC, I think we all are aware of the realities of life. You can't avoid it if you watch the news or read the newspaper. There are people who don't "give a hoot" about their own children. So should we all just stand by while children are abused, neglected? We have cultures that think it's right to mutilate the genitals of their female children, to murder their women for being raped. Just how "culturally sensitive" are we willing to be? There are always gray areas in any argument, but there is also black and white. There is right, and there is wrong. Humans do terrible things to each other, to other living creatures, and to the world around us. Because so many people are afraid to take a stand and speak out against it is the reason such things continue. I would like to think that slowly - so painfully slowly - over the next few millenia, we are going to develop as a species into something much, much better than we are now. Because otherwise we are just sitting here wasting space. What's the point? Change doesn't just happen one day... what each one of us leaves behind makes a difference to what comes after, for good or bad. I want to see the time (but know I won't) when we will no longer have a dichotomy of thinking that only our own little part of the universe matters and that what other people do, no matter how abhorrent, is OK just because it doesn't affect our immediate plans. I do believe that I am my brother's keeper to the extent I am able. That extends to all the world around me. Just a very small piece of my dream for us is to reach a time and place where there is no NEED to slaughter horses. By continuing this we are diminished just that little bit more.
I have been doing what I can to see the end of horse slaughter, I call and write my legislators, I don't breed my mares, I have only gelings, I support deserving rescues, and I have rescued enough horses that there were times when they were eating MUCH better than me. I stand behind what I believe in. It's very hard to understand how those who profess to love horses can accept their slaughter with such callous disregard as I've been reading.
What exactly is there to stand for?
I am not one of those who in expressing opinions confines themselves to facts. - Mark Twain
The fact that man knows right from wrong proves his intellectual superiority to other creatures; but the fact that he can do wrong proves his moral inferiority to any creature that cannot. - Mark Twain
|
|
-
-
thatwindow


- Joined on 12-13-2007
- sacramento ca.
- Ground Training
|
Spotted Pony, The reason over breeding is the cause of slaughter is because the meat is affordable. If there were fewer horses sold for meat the price would go up and fewer people would be willing to pay for it. No, you're never going to end it completely, but you could curb it. Also, if horses were raised as livestock animals, like cattle or sheep, rarely handled and for the most part wild, I would be ok with that. I wouldn't like it, I don't LIKE the killing of any creature, but I could accept it. I too am a realist.
The problem I have is companion animals that are sent off to slaughter. These are animals that know and trust humans to care for them. They are put into a very cruel and uncaring situation. They are cast off as nothing more than a liability, a mouth someone doesn't want to feed anymore. And for those of you who are going to respond with " it's no different than you putting the horse to sleep yourself" don't bother. The two situations don't even compare.
At home: my horse would be in a familiar setting. He would have me there to comfort him and rub is head until the end. His pasture mates would be there to keep him company. He would be in his stall where it is quiet and he feels safe. It would be like any other day for him except that he may be sick or injured. When the drugs became effective, we would help him lay down so he would'nt be scared. His passing would be as peaceful as I could possibly make it.
Now, going to slaughter; loaded into a holding pen with a hundred other terrified horses. Possibly no water or food. Poked and prodded by buyers and auction workers, ran into a bidding corral, 100's of people yelling, loud speakers, run out of bidding corral back into holding pen, poked and prodded into a livestock trailer with a hundred other terrified horses, hauled 3 to 4 days, no food, no water, no breaks, unloaded the same way into more holding pens, held there to be fattened up, chased behind another terrified horse into a slaughter chute to, at best, have a metal rod ran into his brain. Lets pray that this hypothetical horse isn't injured or sick (which many of them are). Because if he is, you have to ad that into the mix.
And that is not propaganda. That is the way it is done... everywhere. Even here in the USA when it was legal.
Poverty, I wish you lived closer, cause we would be friends:)
|
|
-
|
|
Slaughter is not the problem – it is only a symptom of the real problem which has so many facets such as over breeding (not only the backyard breeders that breed out of ignorance but the racing industry too which breeds for $), throw away mentality, ignorance (people that just buy a horse on a whim with no idea of the commitment it involves and does not know how to take care of and/or train properly), young horses raced beyond their physical capabilities and thus are lame and useless etc..
By allowing slaughter to continue, we are just masking the problem. This way we do not see the amount of unwanted “useless” horses. They are destroyed and gone, no one sees and knows - therefore it does not exist – and everyone lives happily ever after. The ban of slaughter brought to light a problem that was already there (a problem caused by humans I might add) - it made it more painfully obvious and instead of addressing the real problem we still talk about allowing slaughter. It honestly makes me wonder as to how “civilized” we are by making an innocent animal pay for our own mistakes. None of these horses ask to be born; they are here because of us. Like it or not, that makes us responsible for their well-being. Instead we work them hard, fail to provide good training and care, and expect them to perform at their best. If they do – great! They’re pampered, covered in roses, are the toast of society but when they don’t (because they’re over-faced, untrained, untalented, grow old etc..) we just destroy them and start over with another one.
Regulations exist in all industries to protect the well-being of stakeholders and establish ethical conduct. Why should the horse industry be any different? Why shouldn’t there be a standard as to how a horse is treated and its standard of life? Yes, there are some regulations (in the TB racing industry etc..) but it is not enough to ensure the well-being of these animals. A lot of $$ is going around there, why can’t there be some sort of tax that collects in a fund that can be used to take care of retired or “useless” horses? Cotoncandie:“You need to understand that not every single person on this earth sees horses the way we do. I know of horse owners that don't give a hoot what happens with their horses. To them, horses are work tools, money makers, not companions, wether they end up in a slaughter house or a retirement home doesn't really bother them much.”How right you are! They are not like the people on this forum who truly think of their horses as companions. Don’t you think that they should have some responsibility in providing their horses a decent quality life? Don’t their horses deserve better? Allowing slaughter will only encourage these people to continue their ways, and their horses will be the ones that suffer the consequences. There should be regulations and consequences as to how a “money - making” horse is treated.
Education is an important factor also. By this I mean educating professionals and those that own a horse for pleasure alike. Anyone can claim that they’re professionals no matter how questionable or downright inhumane his/her methods are. I’m sure that nearly all of you have heard of or know someone like this; I know it has been discussed many times on this board. There should be a way of distinguishing (preferably eliminating) these people from those who actually know what they’re doing. It is because of these so-called trainers that many horses end up “psycho” and eventually gotten rid of. Saying that horse slaughter is a matter of demand and supply overly simplifies the situation. Today, there is a demand for illegal drugs, but would it be ethical to provide a supply for it? Or if there were a demand for human meat from cannibalistic cultures – would that make it right? Also claiming that “this is the way it always has been, so that’s the way it’ll be” is a pathetic excuse at best. Just think- where would mankind be now if everyone always thought like that? I think we can all imagine the answer to that question. These horses are not like cattle or any other animal that is slaughtered. They are not bred and raised to produce meat. They spend a lifetime working very very hard (and usually damaged because of this) for us – both for our enjoyment and/or financial gain - and they deserve to have a proper retirement and humane treatment at the end of their days. They are not a simple lifeless product that must be replaced once it stops working. There are few things that people have touched and haven’t damaged and I can’t stand the arrogance and cruelty that people show when passing judgment to other beings. As humans, I think we should be better than that.
|
|
-
-
-
-
povertybyhorse


- Joined on 07-14-2007
- Indiana
- Under Saddle
|
Well thought out response, Akhal-teke! In the end it all boils down to taking the easy way out, which humans do soooo well!
I am not one of those who in expressing opinions confines themselves to facts. - Mark Twain
The fact that man knows right from wrong proves his intellectual superiority to other creatures; but the fact that he can do wrong proves his moral inferiority to any creature that cannot. - Mark Twain
|
|
-
|
|
thatwindow, povertybyhorse:
Well thought out response, Akhal-teke! In the end it all boils down to taking the easy way out, which humans do soooo well!
Thanks.. and yeah they do. Especially when it is at the expense of those that cannot defend themselves. Makes me mad..
|
|
-
-
-
-
Sherri


- Joined on 12-31-2007
- Eastern Oregon
- Foal
|
I have not read each and every post as there just too many and I might repeat something so forgive me. Have any of you heard how they are slaughtering horses in Mexico? It is ugly. I won't go into details. Do you realize that our horses are being sent down there because we chose to not slaughter in the US.
I don't like the idea of killing a horse either but what do you do when you have one that something goes wrong and you need to. Would you want to shoot it and bury it or would you rather it taken away and remember the horse as it was in its day! Do you want to take care of horse with a broken leg or something that is going to costs you thousands and thousands of dollars.
There are too many people breeding and making the horse industry in a slump but what your gonna find is people are just turning their horses loose in the desert or mtns and that is going to make ferel horses. They are not truly wild so now what are you going to do with all the grass they are eating and taking from the wild animals and horses.
Lets use our heads people and bring back the slaughter. It is for the best!
|
|
-
-
-
-
Sherri


- Joined on 12-31-2007
- Eastern Oregon
- Foal
|
Maybe we could throw the freeloading cattle ranchers off the public lands and put the animals that belong there back into managed herds, packs, etc, and eat a little less beef. Am I the only one who knows the reality of what the BLM actually does with our tax $$$s?
THEY ARE NOT FREELOADERS! Do you know what ranchers pay? NO probably not. They pay yearly to have this valuable land. Do you eat meat? If so don't you want it all natural? I worked as a ranch hand for years and I guess you don't understand what it takes to raise meat and what a rancher does for the land its self. I have built many miles of fence to protect riparian areas and springs.
We were always moving the cattle around the forest to take care of the land, we never let them over graze. The rancher is one of the best assests against forest fires. Since we can't log anymore we have to do something.
|
|
-
-
Sherri


- Joined on 12-31-2007
- Eastern Oregon
- Foal
|
I am not greedy, just realistic. You didn't get what I meant. There are definate exceptions!
|
|
|